<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whither Kyoto?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/</link>
	<description>What are we getting for our climate action dollars?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boulder Carbon Tax Tracker » City Clarifies: No Backpedaling on Kyoto</title>
		<link>http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Boulder Carbon Tax Tracker » City Clarifies: No Backpedaling on Kyoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171;&#160;Whither Kyoto?       21 03 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo;&nbsp;Whither Kyoto?       21 03 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmyG</title>
		<link>http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tom. 

Obviously, this possible shifting of target dates is something that Boulderites who are interested in climate change issues should keep a close eye on. If anyone knows or finds out more about this, I encourage you to speak up here or in our Forum. This definitely warrants public discussion

Again, there will be a City Council study session on April 8 where Environmental Affairs will submit recommendations on this and other matters concerning Climate Smart. Study sessions generally aren't open for public comment, but they are open to the public, and it would be an opportunity to learn more details.

We will be following this closely.

Thanks, and I hope to see you on this site again. Please let people know what we're doing here and that anyone is welcome to participate in whatever way they find comfortable.

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tom. </p>
<p>Obviously, this possible shifting of target dates is something that Boulderites who are interested in climate change issues should keep a close eye on. If anyone knows or finds out more about this, I encourage you to speak up here or in our Forum. This definitely warrants public discussion</p>
<p>Again, there will be a City Council study session on April 8 where Environmental Affairs will submit recommendations on this and other matters concerning Climate Smart. Study sessions generally aren&#8217;t open for public comment, but they are open to the public, and it would be an opportunity to learn more details.</p>
<p>We will be following this closely.</p>
<p>Thanks, and I hope to see you on this site again. Please let people know what we&#8217;re doing here and that anyone is welcome to participate in whatever way they find comfortable.</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see if this trial balloon stays afloat going into the April 8 meeting, and whether data supports a proposal to extend the goals. Let us know what you think here or on a new thread our Boulder Carbon Tax Tracker forum here: http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/forum/showthread.php?p=16#post16</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see if this trial balloon stays afloat going into the April 8 meeting, and whether data supports a proposal to extend the goals. Let us know what you think here or on a new thread our Boulder Carbon Tax Tracker forum here: <a href="http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/forum/showthread.php?p=16#post16" rel="nofollow">http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/forum/showthread.php?p=16#post16</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McKinnon</title>
		<link>http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McKinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bouldercarbontax.org/2008/03/20/whither-kyoto/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>I, too, am concerned about abandoning the Kyoto goal.  We worked hard to get 202 passed at the ballot box with promise that we would strive to meet the UN goals.

1.  If we are abandoning Kyoto, let's come right out and say it rather than couching it in obfuscatory language like "we're looking to longer time horizons".

2.  Give the climate activists in the city every chance to keep us on track before the ClimateSmart office makes this unilateral decision.

Regards,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am concerned about abandoning the Kyoto goal.  We worked hard to get 202 passed at the ballot box with promise that we would strive to meet the UN goals.</p>
<p>1.  If we are abandoning Kyoto, let&#8217;s come right out and say it rather than couching it in obfuscatory language like &#8220;we&#8217;re looking to longer time horizons&#8221;.</p>
<p>2.  Give the climate activists in the city every chance to keep us on track before the ClimateSmart office makes this unilateral decision.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
